Google+ Followers

Saturday, 10 March 2018

The Pain of Rejection - for judges as well as writers




I took a temporary break from writing to help judge two short story competitions and hope this post is useful for writers who suffer the disappointment of not seeing their story reach a long-list, or move from long to short-list. As a writer well-acquainted with the pain of rejection, I'm acutely aware of the hopes being dashed when a story doesn't make it.

As a judge, I have read scores of truly excellent stories. Plenty of strong voices, original premises and stunning conclusions. It has been such a privilege. I gave so many stories a YES, or a very strong MAYBE, and meanwhile my fellow-judges were choosing their favourites too.

Ultimately, this meant incredibly tough choices had to be made, especially during the re-reads when a MAYBE might change to a YES because several delicately nuanced stories were even more impressive at the second reading. It was exciting to discover these, but had the effect of adding more contenders to the next stage - and therefore even more anguish to the decision-making.

It is horribly hard to part company with these stories. Many miss the final selection by a hair's breadth. In the end, the fate of an otherwise beautiful piece of writing can rest on one awkward sentence, or a touch too much distracting backstory in the opening paragraph.

Other reasons for not making the final cut? Perhaps the narrative holds the tension brilliantly until the denouement, then slightly peters out in the vital last few paragraphs. Or the pace of a slower starter eventually picks up well and builds to a spectacular ending, but the story has taken one too many detours along the way. And sometimes it's a case of the theme not being fully explored, or it might have become a little lost or obscured within the plot.

It may seem nit-picking, but locating these kinds of distractions from the narrative is the only means of separation.

Some of the stories which came so close to winning through will stay with me for a long time. These 'rejected' favourites don't stop being favourites. They don't stop being well-executed, compelling stories. They may have missed the lists this time, but only because of the other strong contenders - not because they didn't deserve to be there.



7 comments:

  1. It's true, there are still some stories that came so close to winning the Greenacre Writers short story comp, as you will remember as our very excellent judge. And they stay with you and you think about them and sometimes feel sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much, Rosie. It makes me feel very sad and I can only hope the writers still keep their faith in those stories and are still submitting them to competitions. Some of mine have succeeded after several attempts. xxx

      Delete
  2. Have just seen this excellent post, Joanna. I completely agree with you about the difficulty of choosing from many good stories. I've adjudicated quite a lot of competitions in Scottish circles, and at the conference, and often find it difficult to stick to just first, second and third if the quality is particularly high. I sometimes give a highly commended or commended but have to watch not to dilute the impact for the top three. At our annual conference, I used to remind entrants that their story might be the one to get published, even if it's not a prize-winner - that's what happened with a couple of mine!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you so much, Rosemary. These are very wise words and so true about non-prize winning stories getting published! xxx

      Delete
  3. Having been a story judge myself, I know exactly how you feel, Joanna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Wendy - it isn't easy, is it? Making the decisions can be agonising! xxx

      Delete
  4. It was exciting for me that you discover these stages.
    meet and greet Heathrow

    ReplyDelete